Home / Company / How we compare
How we compareTwo kinds of tools. Both stop short.
Today you can buy a broad toll back-office suite or a horizontal reconciliation platform. One treats reconciliation as a side module; the other has no idea what tolling is. Here is where TollParity is different.
Legacy back-office suites
Broad, heavily customized systems that own the whole operation. Reconciliation is one module inside a large suite — reactive by design, and expensive to change.
Horizontal reconciliation platforms
Modern, fast, and increasingly AI-enabled — but with no concept of tolling feeds, composites, or phantoms. Their intelligence runs at matching, not upstream of the close.
Capability by capability.
At-par, behind, or ahead — with evidence, not adjectives.
| Capability | Legacy back-office suites | Horizontal reconciliation | TollParity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tolling-native model (feeds, composites, phantoms, channels) | ◐ | — | ● |
| Preventive validation upstream of the close | — | — | ● |
| Multi-year exception learning | — | ◐ | ● |
| Agentic rule authoring and triage | — | ◐ | ● |
| Controls verified in code (audit log, SoD, fail-closed) | ◐ | ◐ | ● |
| One core, per-adopter config — no forks | — | ◐ | ● |
| Single-tenant isolation | ◐ | ◐ | ● |
Three things only we do together.
Validation upstream
Prevent mismatches before they ever reach the close.
Tolling-native model
Composites, phantoms, per-channel capture, settlement detail.
One core, configured
A universal platform, single-tenant, with no forks.
Modernize the close.
Move from catching mismatches to preventing them. Tell us about your operation and we will set up a conversation.